Is QUIC protocol still a security concern?
Options
I've ridden that QUIC protocol developed by google, can be a security risk because is not recognized as web traffic by the firewall (usg 210) and then not filtered correctly.
https://www.fastvue.co/fastvue/blog/googles-quic-protocols-security-and-reporting-implications/
The issue is still current?
In order to prevent I currently use a security policy, which block/deny outgoing traffic from LAN to WAN, on port UDP 443
Thank you for your support
0
All Replies
-
As I study for year still now.
I cannot find firewall on the market that claim it can identify the web request via QUIC protocol.
Look like the current work-around is using firewall rule to block UDP destination port 443 to force Chorme to go for standard HTTP protocol.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 396 Beta Program
- 2.1K Nebula
- 117 Nebula Ideas
- 81 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 5.1K Security
- 86 USG FLEX H Series
- 247 Security Ideas
- 1.3K Switch
- 69 Switch Ideas
- 916 WirelessLAN
- 34 WLAN Ideas
- 5.9K Consumer Product
- 211 Service & License
- 337 News and Release
- 71 Security Advisories
- 21 Education Center
- 5 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 2K FAQ
- 912 Nebula FAQ
- 419 Security FAQ
- 237 Switch FAQ
- 207 WirelessLAN FAQ
- 46 Consumer Product FAQ
- 139 Service & License FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 72 About Community
- 62 Security Highlight